This article is part of a yearlong reporting project focused on redistricting and gerrymandering in Pennsylvania. It is made possible by the support of Spotlight PA members and Votebeat, a project focused on election integrity and voting access.
HARRISBURG — A former University of Pittsburgh chancellor will chair the committee in charge of drawing Pennsylvania’s legislative districts, a potentially tie-breaking position that can influence who holds power in the General Assembly for the next decade.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court announced Monday that it had appointed Mark Nordenberg, who previously served as the dean of Pitt’s law school, to the Legislative Reapportionment Commission.
The four legislative leaders on the panel — Republicans Sen. Kim Ward and Rep. Kerry Benninghoff, and Democrats Sen. Jay Costa and Rep. Joanna McClinton — failed to agree on a fifth member after interviewing more than 30 people last week, giving the responsibility of naming a chair to the high court.
“It was an assignment I thought I could perhaps do some good in,” Nordenberg told Spotlight PA and Votebeat during a phone interview Monday afternoon, explaining “the court” approached him and asked if he would consider serving if the four commissioners couldn’t come to a consensus.
The commission must now wait until at least mid-August for the U.S. Census Bureau to deliver the new population data needed to begin redrawing Pennsylvania’s state House and Senate districts.
In their order, the justices — five Democrats and two Republicans — did not explain why they picked Nordenberg. The redistricting chair typically serves as mediator and referee between the four legislators, who historically have submitted maps that benefit their own party. The chair also serves as the tie-breaker vote in the event of an impasse.
“I know that it’s going to be a lot of work, and there may be contentious moments along the way. But it is an extraordinarily important process for Pennsylvania’s democracy,” he said.
Nordenberg, who was born and raised in Minnesota, became a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law in 1977. He became dean of the law school in 1985 and was elected chancellor in 1996.
He announced his retirement in June 2013 and was named chair of the University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics, an independent nonprofit at Pitt, a year later.
Nordenberg will be the third former law professor to serve in the role. The position has also been held by three former judges. The chair has always been a man.
It’s the fifth time in the commission’s six-decade existence that the court has appointed a chair after commissioners deadlocked.
Nordenberg said he was a finalist for the chair position once before, when he was a law school dean in 1991. The four legislative commissioners at the time voted 2-1 with one abstention to appoint him, but questions about whether a majority vote was needed made him walk away from the position, leaving the court to appoint someone.
The caucus leaders told the state Supreme Court justices in a letter Friday that they wanted someone who was a “fair and neutral arbiter of the process” and who hadn’t run for office or worked as a lobbyist recently.
“This will ensure the chair of the commission will come into this process dissociated from partisan politics,” the commissioners wrote.
Nordenberg said he hasn’t spoken directly to the four commissioners, but reached out to them individually to get a better sense of their expectations for his role as chair. He wasn’t one of the roughly three dozen people the caucus leaders publicly interviewed for the position.
In statements, the two Democrats on the committee, Costa and McClinton, said Nordenberg was qualified for the position. Benninghoff and Ward, the Republicans, said they were pleased the appointment was made in a timely manner.
“The citizens of Pennsylvania are counting on him to navigate the challenging process in his role as chairman of the commission,” Ward said in a statement.
A registered Democrat who identifies as a centrist “in most things that I do,” Nordenberg said he has worked well with members of both political parties. As chancellor, he spent time in Harrisburg advocating for his university and said he “came away with genuine respect for and good feelings toward” state House and Senate members.
“I have admiration for people on both sides of the aisle,” he said.
He has been publicly critical of former Republican President Donald Trump, writing that Trump’s allusions to violence — including his call to armed militia members to “liberate” state capitols — were “troubling” and that Trump’s time in office deserved a “D” grade “for disease, denial, deceit and division.”
The once-a-decade redrawing of Pennsylvania’s political boundaries comes after a year of intense partisan clashes over the 2020 election and the state’s pandemic response. While Republicans held redistricting power a decade ago, that balance has shifted toward Democrats because of changes in the executive and judicial branches.
Republican lawmakers will draw a new congressional map as part of legislation, but it must go to Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf for approval. Should they fail to reach an agreement, the state Supreme Court could be asked to step in.
The five-member Legislative Reapportionment Commission, meanwhile, draws the state House and Senate maps. Anyone may challenge one or both of the final maps within 30 days, and if that happens, the high court steps in for a review.
In 2011, the Republican-majority Supreme Court rejected the commission’s first maps for splitting too many municipalities in violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution.
Nordenberg said he isn’t coming into the process with any kind of partisan bias.
“I think that fair elections are essential to democracy, and fair district lines are essential to fair elections,” he said.
WHILE YOU’RE HERE… If you learned something from this story, pay it forward and become a member of Spotlight PA so someone else can in the future at spotlightpa.org/donate. Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results.
